London Post profile shows how dubious credentials can gain authority online

More on this

1. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16279839/Russia-pink-slime-poisoning-propaganda-Kremlin-harmless-hatchet.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ito=1490&ns_campaign=1490 - Please view link - unable to able to access data
2. https://www.cityam.com/the-media-moguls-behind-a-london-pink-slime-empire/ - City A.M.’s investigation examines the London Post and its parent company, 2Trom Media Group, describing a collection of websites that mix routine local material with unusual international political and business stories. The reporter notes that many articles appear to repeat press releases and carry the generic “Ldn-Post” byline rather than a named journalist. The investigation discusses the use of the term “pink slime” for sites that imitate local news while publishing low-quality or potentially agenda-driven content. It considers how repeated online claims may affect search results, artificial-intelligence summaries and, potentially, decisions made by banking or compliance systems. The article traces 2Trom’s corporate history and reported ownership links, including Viktor Tokarev, Moscow Media Group and BE Group, while distinguishing documented filings from claims and unanswered questions. It also recounts the involvement of former director Mathetes Chihwai, who used the name Matthew Martino, and the London Post’s coverage of Tommy Robinson’s appointment as a goodwill ambassador to Martino’s benevolent fund. The piece reports on attempts to contact people associated with the company and visits to addresses connected with it. Its account supports claims about the outlet’s publishing practices, company structure and reported connections, but it is an investigative article, not a court ruling establishing every allegation as fact.
3. https://www.cityam.com/russian-propaganda-website-hit-with-record-pink-slime-payout/ - City A.M. reports on a High Court defamation case brought by Uzbek businessman Ovik Mkrtchyan against 2Trom Media Group and its director, Viktor Tokarev. The case concerned a London Post article that accused Mkrtchyan of involvement in corruption, embezzlement, money-laundering and the seizure of state assets. According to the report, the publisher did not contest the case, and judgment was entered by default. The court awarded Mkrtchyan £105,000 in damages and more than £117,000 in legal costs, which the article describes as the largest publicly reported payout in a so-called “pink slime” case. It says the judge accepted that the article had seriously damaged Mkrtchyan’s reputation and contributed to consequences for his businesses and a family member’s banking services. The story explains that “pink slime” refers to websites that present themselves as legitimate publishers while publishing material used for misinformation or propaganda. It also discusses how such articles may be indexed by search engines and used by artificial-intelligence tools, compliance services or other systems. The article cites legal commentary on possible responses, including requests for removal, search delisting and litigation. It provides an independent account of the legal outcome described in the supplied article, while making clear that the defamation judgment was entered by default rather than after a contested trial.
4. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11673306/officers - This is the official Companies House officers page for 2Trom Media Group Ltd, company number 11673306. It records the company’s listed directors and their appointment histories, providing a primary source for checking the corporate details discussed in the supplied article. The page lists Viktor Tokarev as an active director, gives his recorded nationality and the correspondence address filed with Companies House, and shows his appointment date. It also lists Mathetes Chihwai as a former director, with his appointment and resignation dates and recorded nationality. A separate entry documents an earlier period in which Tokarev was listed as a director before resigning. The page is useful for verifying what has been formally filed about the company’s officers, but it does not independently establish whether the details supplied by officers are accurate. Companies House explicitly cautions that it does not check the accuracy of information filed. Nor does this page prove the company’s operational activities, its editorial practices, its owners’ motives, or any alleged links to Russian state bodies. It does, however, provide an official public record relevant to the article’s discussion of 2Trom’s corporate structure and named directors. The information is presented in the government register format, with dates and addresses as filed, rather than as a journalistic investigation or an assessment of the allegations made about the publisher.
5. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/the-rise-of-partisan-local-newsrooms.php - The Columbia Journalism Review’s Tow Center article surveys partisan local-news networks in the United States, including Metric Media, and explains how local-news formats can be used to advance political agendas. It describes the strategy as borrowing the trust and legitimacy associated with local reporting while publishing material intended to support preferred candidates or attack opponents. The article reports that Metric Media has roughly 1,200 sites and describes much of its output as automated items about weather, sports, business data and local-government agendas. It also discusses a smaller number of articles that promote right-wing Republican candidates or criticise political rivals. The piece draws on prior Tow Center research and other investigations into funding and relationships associated with the network. This source is relevant to the supplied article’s comparison between Britain’s alleged pink-slime outlets and the much larger US network Metric Media. It offers background on the broader phenomenon rather than evidence about 2Trom, the London Post, or the specific Russian connections alleged in the supplied text. The article’s reporting helps explain why websites that look like local news may deserve scrutiny of their ownership, funding, authorship and editorial purpose. It also places these outlets in the context of an increasingly politicised media environment, where partisan news operations can act not merely as observers of political events but as participants seeking to shape them.
6. https://www.axios.com/2024/06/11/partisan-news-websites-dark-money - Axios reports on the growth of politically backed websites designed to resemble impartial local news outlets in the United States. Drawing on a NewsGuard analysis, it says that at least 1,265 sites had been identified as backed by dark money or intentionally masquerading as local news for political purposes, a total that exceeded the number of local daily newspapers cited in the article. Axios notes that many of the sites were directed at communities in swing states, and describes “pink slime” as a term used for politically motivated sites that pose as independent local outlets. The report identifies Metric Media as a major network and says many of its sites provide little information about funders or management; it also notes that articles often lack bylines or are marked as press-release submissions. The story includes perspectives from organisations that dispute how some partisan outlets are characterised, giving readers context rather than treating all networks as identical. It also explains that the decline of local newspapers creates an information gap that political organisations may seek to fill, and that newer content-generation tools can make it easier to establish and promote sites online. This article supports the supplied text’s general explanation of pink-slime publishing and its potential use in political messaging. It is US-focused and does not verify the specific claims about the London Post or 2Trom.
7. https://internewscast.com/news/how-russias-pink-slime-is-poisoning-online-news/ - This article reproduces a detailed account of the London Post, the supposed Sir Patrick Bijou persona, 2Trom Media Group and allegations of Russian-linked influence. It describes Bijou as an alter ego of Eric Danison and recounts the supplied article’s claims about Danison’s fraud conviction, the London Post’s lack of named bylines, and the appearance of similar profiles on other websites. It explains the “pink slime” label as a description of outlets that look like local news organisations but publish low-quality, copied or politically motivated material. The article also summarises the London Post’s coverage of Uzbek businessman Ovik Mkrtchyan and the subsequent defamation award, and discusses how search engines and AI systems may repeat information found online. Further sections cover 2Trom, its reported portfolio of sites, listed directors, alleged corporate connections and the London Post’s treatment of Tommy Robinson. Because this is a republished account of substantially the same investigation rather than a clearly independent verification, it should be used as a guide to the claims, not as separate corroboration of them. It is nevertheless a working page that collects the principal allegations and themes in one place, including the concerns about anonymous publishing, algorithmic amplification and the effects that damaging online material may have beyond ordinary readership.